Est. 2026 · AI-Native Long / Short

The compute
decade.

Hyperleap Capital is a hedge fund built around a single thesis: the buildout of artificial intelligence is the defining economic event of our lifetime, and public markets are still pricing it one bottleneck at a time. We invest across the entire chain — silicon, power, and the firms that AI remakes.

Flagship Fund

HLC Intelligence Master

Live

Illustrative chart: HLC Intelligence composite versus MSCI World over the trailing 72 months. Figures are placeholders — see the performance table below for the full illustrative track record.

HLC Intelligence MSCI World

Ann. Return

Sharpe

Max DD

B

Assets under management

Core positions

%

Gross in the AI complex

yrs

Average holding period

01 / Thesis

Not a sector. A regime.

Most capital allocates to artificial intelligence the way it allocates to an industry. We underwrite it as a macro regime — one that reorders industrial capacity, energy demand, and corporate earnings power faster than consensus models can revise them.

01

Scaling has not stopped.

Training compute continues to advance by orders of magnitude, and algorithmic efficiency compounds on top of it. Capability improvement remains a function of inputs we can count — wafers, memory, megawatts — long before it shows up in a revenue line.

02

The constraint keeps moving.

Every eighteen months the binding constraint relocates: leading-edge logic, then high-bandwidth memory, then advanced packaging, then interconnect queues, then electricity itself. Return accrues to whoever owns the constraint before the market names it.

03

The tail is mispriced.

Markets discount transformative outcomes toward the mean because career risk punishes early conviction. That asymmetry is durable, and it is the reason a concentrated, thesis-driven book can outperform for years rather than quarters.

02 / Portfolio

One thesis, four expressions.

The book is concentrated and long-biased, hedged with short exposure to the business models that AI erodes. Capital moves along the supply chain as the bottleneck migrates.

01

Compute

Leading-edge logic, high-bandwidth memory, advanced packaging, networking silicon, and the equipment makers with no substitute. The narrowest part of the chain and the hardest to replicate.

  • BiasLong
  • Horizon2–5 years

02

Power & Buildout

Generation, transmission, turbines, transformers, and thermal management. Frontier training runs are electricity problems long before they are software problems, and the grid cannot be scaled on software timelines.

  • BiasLong
  • Horizon3–7 years

03

Adopters & Displaced

Long the firms whose unit economics inflect once inference is cheap. Short the seat-based, labour-arbitrage, and attention-rent models whose moats dissolve at the same moment — the funding leg of the book.

  • BiasLong / short
  • Horizon6–24 months

04

Frontier Private

Selective positions in frontier labs, neoclouds, and data-centre infrastructure where no public expression exists yet. Sized as option premium, not as core risk.

  • BiasLong
  • Sleeve cap15% NAV

03 / Research

Count the inputs.
Then take the risk.

Our work is closer to industrial forecasting than to equity research. We build the physical picture first — how much silicon, how many megawatts, on what schedule — and only then ask what is in the price.

  1. I

    Trace the chain

    Fab starts, HBM allocation, packaging capacity, transformer and turbine lead times, interconnect queues. Bottom-up, unit by unit, from primary sources.

  2. II

    Find the constraint

    Only one input binds at a time. We identify it, verify who monetises it, and establish the position before the shortage becomes a headline.

  3. III

    Underwrite the tail

    Positions are sized for a distribution, not a point estimate — large enough to matter if the thesis is right, small enough to survive the drawdown before it is.

  4. IV

    Update on evidence

    Model releases, capex guidance, power contracts, and export policy are scored against our written forecasts. When the physical picture changes, the book changes.

The constraint stack, today

Illustrative · updated quarterly

Leading-edge logic — advanced node capacity

91% allocated · 2026

High-bandwidth memory — HBM4 supply

84% allocated · 2026

Advanced packaging — CoWoS-class capacity

76% allocated · 2026

Grid interconnection — queued data-centre load

68% of new load queued

Power generation — dispatchable capacity additions

52% of forecast buildout online

04 / Performance

Track record.

Fund results, net of fees, against a global equity benchmark. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Annual fund performance versus MSCI World, 2021–2025, illustrative
Year Fund MSCI World Excess Net exposure Max drawdown
2025+41.2%+11.2%+30.0%68%−12.4%
2024+36.8%+9.4%+27.4%74%−9.8%
2023+52.6%+14.8%+37.8%71%−11.1%
2022−14.3%−18.1%+3.8%52%−26.7%
2021+29.4%+18.4%+11.0%77%−8.2%

Figures shown are illustrative and provided for presentation purposes only. A concentrated, thesis-driven strategy carries materially higher volatility and drawdown risk than a diversified portfolio. Nothing on this page constitutes an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security.

05 / Insights

Published thinking.

The research notes behind the book — bottom-up, dated, and kept up whether the call was right or wrong.

Compute Feb 2026

HBM4 is the binding constraint through 2026.

Why high-bandwidth memory allocation, not wafer starts, is setting the pace of the next training-cluster generation — and who captures the margin.

Read the note
Power Jan 2026

The grid, not the GPU, sets the ceiling.

A unit-by-unit accounting of queued data-centre load against dispatchable generation additions across three grid operators.

Read the note
Adopters Dec 2025

Where seat-based pricing breaks first.

Mapping the software categories whose unit economics invert once inference cost falls below the labour it replaces.

Read the note

06 / Firm

Built to hold the position.

A thesis this concentrated is only investable with the right capital base and the right time horizon. Hyperleap is structured so that neither the firm nor its partners are forced to sell the idea at the wrong moment.

Long-duration capital

Multi-year lockups by design. We would rather take fewer dollars than take money that leaves at the first drawdown.

Aligned

A material share of the firm's own capital sits in the same positions, on the same terms, with the same lockup.

Published thinking

Partners receive the full research record — the models, the forecasts, and the calls we got wrong.

Team roster illustrative — replace with the firm's actual partners before launch.

Founding Partner & CIO

Sets portfolio construction and position sizing. Background spanning semiconductor equity research and macro rates.

Head of Research

Leads the bottom-up supply-chain work — fab starts, HBM allocation, packaging capacity, grid interconnection queues.

Head of Portfolio Construction

Owns risk sizing, hedging, and the short book that funds the long-duration compute and power sleeves.

Head of Investor Relations

First point of contact for allocators — due diligence, reporting, and the full research record.

07 / Contact

Investor relations

Hyperleap Capital accepts capital from qualified institutional investors and eligible professional clients. We are happy to share our research and our thesis in full.

Prefer email? Write to hello@hyperleapcapital.com

Office

Hong Kong · New York